Guidelines for Preventing Workplace Violence for Health Care and Social Service WorkersU.S. Department of LaborOccupational Safety and Health Administration OSHA 3148 Material contained in this publication is in the public domain and may be reproduced, fully or partially, without permission of the Federal Government. Source credit is requested by not required. This information will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202)219-8615; Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TDD) message referral phone: 1-800-326-2577. To The Reader If you have recommendations about the usefulness of this publication as a reference tool or about other informational topics that would be helpful to you in operating your business or performing your job, please write to Editor, OSHA Publications Office, P.O. Box 37535, Washington, DC 20013-7535, or Fax to (202)219-9266. Contents
Extent of Problem Risk Factors Overview of Guidelines Violence Prevention Program Elements
Written Program
Monitoring Trends and Analyzing Incidents Screening Surveys Workplace Security Analysis
Administrative and Work Practice Controls Post-Incident Response
Supervisors, Managers, and Security Personnel Recordkeeping and Evaluation of the Program
Evaluation Sources of Assistance These guidelines are not a new standard or regulation. They are advisory in nature, informational in content, and are intended for use by employers seeking to provide a safe and healthful workplace through effective workplace violence prevention programs adapted to the needs and resources of each place of employment. The guidelines are not intended to address issues related to patient care. The guidelines are performance-oriented and the implementation of the recommendations will be different based upon an establishment's hazard analysis. Violence inflicted upon employees may come from many sources -- i.e., patients, third parties such as robbers or muggers -- and may include co-worker violence. These guidelines address only the violence inflicted by patients or clients against staff. It is suggested, however, that workplace violence policies indicate a zero-tolerance for violence of any kind. The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSH Act)1 mandates that, in addition to compliance with hazard-specific standards, all employers have a general duty to provide their employees with a workplace free from recognized hazards likely to cause death or serious physical harm. OSHA will rely on Section 5(a) of the OSH Act, the "General Duty Clause,"2 for enforcement authority. Employers can be cited for violating the General Duty Clause if there is a recognized hazard of workplace violence in their establishments and they do nothing to prevent or abate it. Failure to implement these guidelines is not in itself a violation of the General Duty Clause of the OSH Act. OSHA will not cite employers who have effectively implemented these guidelines. Further, when Congress passed the OSH Act, it did so based on a finding that job-related illnesses and injuries were imposing both a hindrance and a substantial burden upon interstate commerce, "in terms of lost production, wage loss, medical expenses, and disability compensation payments."3 At the same time, Congress was mindful of the fact that workers' compensation systems provided state specific remedies for job-related injuries and illnesses. Issues on what constitutes a compensable claim and what the rate of compensation should be were left up to the states, their legislatures, and their courts to determine. Congress acknowledged this point in Section 4(b)(4) of the OSH Act, when it stated categorically: "Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to supersede or in any manner affect any workmen's compensation law . . . ."4 Therefore, these non-mandatory guidelines should not be viewed as enlarging or diminishing the scope of work-related injuries and are intended for use in any state and without regard to whether the injuries or fatalities, if any, are later deemed to be compensable. 1 Public Law 91-596, December 29, 1970; and as amended by P.L. 101-552, Section 3101, November 5, 1990. Many persons, including health care, social services, and employee assistance experts; researchers, educators; unions, and other stakeholders; OSHA professionals; and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) contributed to these guidelines. Also, several states have developed relevant standards or recommendations, such as the California OSHA (CAL/OSHA), CAL/OSHA Guidelines for Workplace Security, and Guidelines for Security and Safety of Health Care and Community Service Workers; the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations, 1995 Accreditation Manuals for Hospitals; Metropolitan Chicago Healthcare Council, Guidelines for Dealing with Violence in Health Care; New Jersey Public Employees Occupational Safety and Health (PEOSH), Guidelines on Measures and Safeguards in Dealing with Violent or Aggressive Behavior in Public Sector Health Care Facilities; and the State of Washington Department of Labor and Industries, Violence in Washington Workplaces, and Study of Assaults on Staff in Washington State Psychiatric Hospitals. Information is available from these and other agencies to assist employers. For many years, health care and social service workers have faced a significant risk of job-related violence. Assaults represent a serious safety and health hazard for these industries, and violence against their employees continues to increase. OSHA'S new violence prevention guidelines provide the agency`s recommendations for reducing workplace violence developed following a careful review of workplace violence studies, public and private violence prevention programs, and consultations with and input from stakeholders. OSHA encourages employers to establish violence prevention programs and to track their progress in reducing work-related assaults. Although not every incident can be prevented, many can, and the severity of injuries sustained by employees reduced. Adopting practical measures such as those outlined here can significantly reduce this serious threat to worker safety. OSHA'S Commitment The publication and distribution of these guidelines is OSHA'S first step in assisting health care and social service employers and providers in preventing workplace violence. OSHA plans to conduct a coordinated effort consisting of research, information, training, cooperative programs, and appropriate enforcement to accomplish this goal. The guidelines are not a new standard or regulation. They are advisory in nature, informational in content, and intended for use by employers in providing a safe and healthful workplace through effective violence prevention programs, adapted to the needs and resources of each place of employment. Extent of Problem Today, more assaults occur in the health care and social services industries than in any other. For example, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data for 1993 showed health care and social service workers having the highest incidence of assault injuries (BLS, 1993). Almost two-thirds of the nonfatal assaults occurred in nursing homes, hospitals, and establishments providing residential care and other social services (Toscano and Weber, 1995). Assaults against workers in the health professions are not new. According to one study (Goodman et al., 1994), between 1980 and 1990, 106 occupational violence-related deaths occurred among the following health care workers: 27 pharmacists, 26 physicians, 18 registered nurses, 17 nurses' aides, and 18 health care workers in other occupational categories. Using the National Traumatic Occupational Fatality database, the study reported that between 1983 and 1989, there were 69 registered nurses killed at work. Homicide was the leading cause of traumatic occupational death among employees in nursing homes and personal care facilities. A 1989 report (Cannel and Hunter) found that the nursing staff at a psychiatric hospital sustained 16 assaults per 100 employees per year. This rate, which includes any assault-related injuries, compares with 8.3 injuries of all types per 100 full-time workers in all industries and 14.2 per 100 full-time workers in the construction industry (BLS, 1991). Of 121 psychiatric hospital workers sustaining 134 injuries, 43 percent involved lost time from work with 13 percent of those injured missing more than 21 days from work. Of greater concern is the likely underreporting of violence and a persistent perception within the health care industry that assaults are part of the job. Underreporting may reflect a lack of institutional reporting policies, employee beliefs that reporting will not benefit them, or employee fears that employers may deem assaults the result of employee negligence or poor job performance. Risk Factors Health care and social service workers face an increased risk of work-related assaults stemming from several factors, including:
Overview of Guidelines In January 1989, OSHA published voluntary, generic safety and health program management guidelines for all employers to use as a foundation for their safety and health programs, which can include a workplace violence prevention programs.6 OSHA'S violence prevention guidelines build on the 1989 generic guidelines by identifying common risk factors and describing some feasible solutions. Although not exhaustive, the new workplace violence guidelines include policy recommendations and practical corrective methods to help prevent and mitigate the effects of workplace violence. The goal is to eliminate or reduce worker exposure to conditions that lead to death or injury from violence by implementing effective security devices and administrative work practices, among other control measures. The guidelines cover a broad spectrum of workers who provide health care and social services in psychiatric facilities, hospital emergency departments, community mental health clinics, drug abuse treatment clinics, pharmacies, community care facilities, and long-term care facilities. They include physicians, registered nurses, pharmacists, nurse practitioners, physicians' assistants, nurses' aides, therapists, technicians, public health nurses, home health care workers, social/welfare workers, and emergency medical care personnel. Further, the guidelines may be usefil in reducing risks for ancillary personnel such as maintenance, dietary, clerical, and security staff employed in the health care and social services industries. 5 According to a 1989 report (Wasserberger), 25 percent of major trauma patients treated in the emergency room carried weapons. Attacks in emergency rooms in gang-related shootings as well as planned escapes from police custody have been documented in hospitals. A 1991 report (Goetz et al.) also found that 17.3 percent of psychiatric patients searched were carrying weapons. Violence Prevention Program Elements There are four main components to any effective safety and health program that also apply to preventing workplace violence, (1) management commitment and employee involvement, (2) worksite analysis, (3) hazard prevention and control, and (4) safety and health training. Management Commitment and Employee Involvement Management commitment and employee involvement are complementary and essential elements of an effective safety and health program. To ensure an effective program, management and front-line employees must work together, perhaps through a team or committee approach. If employers opt for this strategy, they must be careful to comply with the applicable provisions of the National Labor Relations Act.7 Management commitment, including the endorsement and visible involvement of top management, provides the motivation and resources to deal effectively with workplace violence, and should include the following:
Employee involvement and feedback enable workers to develop and express their own commitment to safety and health and provide useful information to design, implement, and evaluate the program. Employee involvement should include the following:
Written Program A written program for job safety and security, incorporated into the organization's overall safety and health program, offers an effective approach for larger organizations. In smaller establishments, the program need not be written or heavily documented to be satisfactory. What is needed are clear goals and objectives to prevent workplace violence suitable for the size and complexity of the workplace operation and adaptable to specific situations in each establishment. The prevention program and startup date must be communicated to all employees. At a minimum, workplace violence prevention programs should do the following:
7 Title 29 U. S. C., Section 158(a)(2). Worksite analysis involves a step-by-step, commonsense look at the workplace to find existing or potential hazards for workplace violence. This entails reviewing specific procedures or operations that contribute to hazards and specific locales where hazards may develop. A "Threat Assessment Team," "Patient Assault Team," similar task force, or coordinator may assess the vulnerability to workplace violence and determine the appropriate preventive actions to be taken. Implementing the workplace violence prevention program then may be assigned to this group. The team should include representatives from senior management, operations, employee assistance, security, occupational safety and health, legal, and human resources staff. The team or coordinator can review injury and illness records and workers' compensation claims to identify patterns of assaults that could be prevented by workplace adaptation, procedural changes, or employee training. As the team or coordinator identifies appropriate controls, these should be instituted. The recommended program for worksite analysis includes, but is not limited to, analyzing and tracking records, monitoring trends and analyzing incidents, screening surveys, and analyzing workplace security. Records Analysis and Tracking This activity should include reviewing medical, safety, workers' compensation and insurance records -- including the OSHA 200 log, if required -- to pinpoint instances of workplace violence. Scan unit logs and employee and police reports of incidents or near-incidents of assaultive behavior to identify and analyze trends in assaults relative to particular departments, units, job titles, unit activities, work stations, and/or time of day. Tabulate these data to target the frequency and severity of incidents to establish a baseline for measuring improvement. Monitoring Trends and Analyzing Incidents Contacting similar local businesses, trade associations, and community and civic groups is one way to learn about their experiences with workplace violence and to help identify trends. Use several years of data, if possible, to trace trends of injuries and incidents of actual or potential workplace violence. Screening Surveys One important screening tool is to give employees a questionnaire or survey to get their ideas on the potential for violent incidents and to identify or confirm the need for improved security measures. Detailed baseline screening surveys can help pinpoint tasks that put employees at risk. Periodic surveys -- conducted at least annually or whenever operations change or incidents of workplace violence occur -- help identify new or previously unnoticed risk factors and deficiencies or failures in work practices, procedures, or controls. Also, the surveys help assess the effects of changes in the work processes (see Appendix A for a sample survey used in the State of Washington). The periodic review process should also include feedback and followup. Independent reviewers, such as safety and health professionals, law enforcement or security specialists, insurance safety auditors, and other qualified persons may offer advice to strengthen programs. These experts also can provide fresh perspectives to improve a violence prevention program. Workplace Security Analysis The team or coordinator should periodically inspect the workplace and evaluate employee tasks to identify hazards, conditions, operations, and situations that could lead to violence. To find areas requiring further evaluation, the team or coordinator should do the following:
After hazards of violence are identified through the systematic worksite analysis, the next step is to design measures through engineering or administrative and work practices to prevent or control these hazards. If violence does occur, post-incidence response can be an important tool in preventing future incidents. Engineering Controls and Workplace Adaptation Engineering controls, for example, remove the hazard from the workplace or create a barrier between the worker and the hazard. There are several measures that can effectively prevent or control workplace hazards, such as those actions presented in the following paragraphs. The selection of any measure, of course, should be based upon the hazards identified in the workplace security analysis of each facility.
Administrative and Work Practice Controls Administrative and work practice controls affect the way jobs or tasks are performed. The following examples illustrate how changes in work practices and administrative procedures can help prevent violent incidents.
Post-Incident Response Post-incident response and evaluation are essential to an effective violence prevention program. All workplace violence programs should provide comprehensive treatment for victimized employees and employees who may be traumatized by witnessing a workplace violence incident. Injured staff should receive prompt treatment and psychological evaluation whenever an assault takes place, regardless of severity. (See sample hospital policy in Appendix C). Transportation of the injured to medical care should be provided if care is not available on-site. Victims of workplace violence suffer a variety of consequences in addition to their actual physical injuries. These include short and long-term psychological trauma, fear of returning to work, changes in relationships with co-workers and family, feelings of incompetence, guilt, powerlessness, and fear of criticism by supervisors or managers. Consequently, a strong followup program for these employees will not only help them to deal with these problems but also to help prepare them to confront or prevent future incidents of violence (Flannery, 1991, 1993; 1995). There are several types of assistance that can be incorporated into the post-incident response. For example, trauma-crisis counseling, critical incident stress debriefing, or employee assistance programs may be provided to assist victims. Certified employee assistance professionals, psychologists, psychiatrists, clinical nurse specialists, or social workers could provide this counseling, or the employer can refer staff victims to an outside specialist. In addition, an employee counseling service, peer counseling, or support groups may be established. In any case, counselors must be well trained and have a good understanding of the issues and consequences of assaults and other aggressive, violent behavior. Appropriate and promptly rendered post-incident debriefings and counseling reduce acute psychological trauma and general stress levels among victims and witnesses. In addition, such counseling educates staff about workplace violence and positively influences workplace and organizational cultural norms to reduce trauma associated with future incidents. Training and education ensure that all staff are aware of potential security hazards and how to protect themselves and their co-workers through established policies and procedures. All Employees Every employee should understand the concept of "universal Precautions for Violence," i.e., that violence should be expected but can be avoided or mitigated through preparation. Staff should be instructed to limit physical interventions in workplace altercations whenever possible, unless there are adequate numbers of staff or emergency response teams and security personnel available. Frequent training also can improve the likelihood of avoiding assault (Carrnel and Hunter, 1990). Employees who may face safety and security hazards should receive formal instruction on the specific hazards associated with the unit or job and facility. This includes information on the types of injuries or problems identified in the facility and the methods to control the specific hazards. The training program should involve all employees, including supervisors and managers. New and reassigned employees should receive an initial orientation prior to being assigned their job duties. Visiting staff, such as physicians, should receive the same training as permanent staff. Qualified trainers should instruct at the comprehension level appropriate for the staff. Effective training programs should involve role playing, simulations, and drills. Topics may include Management of Assaultive Behavior Professional Assault Response Training; police assault avoidance programs, or personal safety training such as awareness, avoidance, and how to prevent assaults. A combination of training maybe used depending on the severity of the risk. Required training should be provided to employees annually. In large institutions, refresher programs may be needed more frequently (monthly or quarterly) to effectively reach and inform all employees. The training should cover topics such as the following:
Supervisors, Managers, and Security Personnel Supervisors and managers should ensure that employees are not placed in assignments that compromise safety and should encourage employees to report incidents. Employees and supervisors should be trained to behave compassionately towards coworkers when an incident occurs. They should learn how to reduce security hazards and ensure that employees receive appropriate training. Following training, supervisors and managers should be able to recognize a potentially hazardous situation and to make any necessary changes in the physical plant, patient care treatment program, and staffing policy and procedures to reduce or eliminate the hazards. Security personnel need specific training from the hospital or clinic, including the psychological components of handling aggressive and abusive clients, types of disorders, and ways to handle aggression and defuse hostile situations. The training program should also include an evaluation. The content, methods, and frequency of training should be reviewed and evaluated annually by the team or coordinator responsible for implementation. Program evaluation may involve supervisor and/or employee interviews, testing and observing, and/or reviewing reports of behavior of individuals in threatening situations. Recordkeeping and Evaluation of the Program Recordkeeping and evaluation of the violence prevention program are necessary to determine overall effectiveness and identify any deficiencies or changes that should be made. Recordkeeping Recordkeeping is essential to the success of a workplace violence prevention program. Good records help employers determine the severity of the problem, evaluate methods of hazard control, and identify training needs. Records can be especially usefid to large organizations and for members of a business group or trade association who "pool" data. Records of injuries, illnesses, accidents, assaults, hazards, corrective actions, patient histories, and training, among others, can help identify problems and solutions for an effective program. The following records are important:
Evaluation As part of their overall program, employers should evaluate their safety and security measures. Top management should review the program regularly, and with each incident, to evaluate program success. Responsible parties (managers, supervisors, and employees) should collectively reevaluate policies and procedures on a regular basis. Deficiencies should be identified and corrective action taken. An evaluation program should involve the following:
Management should share workplace violence prevention program evaluation reports with all employees. Any changes in the program should be discussed at regular meetings of the safety committee, union representatives, or other employee groups. Sources of Assistance Employers who would like assistance in implementing an appropriate workplace violence prevention program can turn to the OSHA Consultation service provided in their state. Primarily targeted at smaller companies, the consultation service is provided at no charge to the employer and is independent of OSHA'S enforcement activity. (See Appendix E.) OSHA'S efforts to assist employers combat workplace violence are complemented by those of NIOSH (1-800-35 -NIOSH) and public safety officials, trade associations, unions, insurers, human resource, and employee assistance professionals as well as other interested groups. Employers and employees may contact these groups for additional advice and information. 9 The Occupational Safety and Health Act and recordkeeping regulations in Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 1904 provide specific recording requirements that comprise the framework of the occupational safety and health recording system (BLS, 1986a). BLS has issued guidelines that provide official Agency interpretations concerning the recordkeeping and reporting of occupational injuries and illnesses (BLS, 1986b). OSHA recognizes the importance of effective safety and health program management in providing safe and healthful workplaces. In fact, OSHA'S consultation services help employers establish and maintain safe and healthful workplaces, and the agency's Voluntary Protection Programs were specifically established to recognize worksites with exemplary safety and health programs. (See Appendix E.) Effective safety and health programs are known to improve both morale and productivity and reduce workers' compensation costs. OSHA'S violence prevention guidelines are an essential component to workplace safety and health programs. OSHA believes that the performance-oriented approach of the guidelines provides employers with flexibility in their efforts to maintain safe and healthful working conditions. California State Department of Industrial Relations. (1995). CAL/OSHA Guidelines for Workplace Security. Division of Occupational Safety and Health, San Francisco, CA. Carmel, H.; Hunter, M. (1989). "Staff Injuries from Inpatient Violence." Hosp Commty Psych 40(1):41-46. Fox, S.; Freeman, C.; Barr, B. et al. (1994). "Identifying Reported Cases of Workplace Violence in Federal Agencies," Unpublished Report, Washington DC. Goodman, R.; Jenkins, L; and Mercy, J. (1994). Workplace-Related Homicide Among Health Care Workers in the United States, 1980 through 1990." JAMA 272(21): 1686-1688. Goetz, R.; Bloom, J.; Chene, S.; et al. (1981). "Weapons Possessed by Patients in a University Emergency Department." Ann Emerg Med 20(1 ): 8-10. Liss, G. (1993). Examination of Workers' Compensation Claims Among Nurses in Ontario for Injuries Due to Violence. Health and Safety Studies Unit, Ontario Ministry of Labour. Novello, A. (1992). "A Medical Response to Violence." JAMA 267:3007. Oregon State Department of Consumer and Business Services. (1994). "Violence in the Workplace, Oregon, 1988 to 1992-A Special Study of Worker's Compensation Claims Caused by Violent Acts." Information Management Division, Salem, OR. Ryan, J.; Poster, E. (1989a). "The Assaulted Nurse: Short-term and Long-term Responses." Arch Psychiat Nursing 3(6): 323-331. Simonowitz, J. (1993). Guidelines for Security and Safety of Health Care and Community Service Workers. Division of Occupational Safety and Health. Department of Industrial Relations, San Francisco, CA. State of Washington, Department of Labor and Industries. (1993). Study of Assaults on Staff in Washington State Psychiatric Hospitals. _______________(1995). Violence in Washington Workplaces, 1992. Toscano, Guy; and Weber, William. (1995). Violence in the Workplace. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Washington, DC. Table 11. U.S. Department of Justice, (1986)Criminal Victimization in the U.S. 1984. A National Crime Survey Report. Pub. No. NCJ-1OO435. Washington D.C. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1995). Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries, 1994. News Bulletin 95-288. _______________(1991). Occupational Injuries and Illnesses in the United States by Industry, 1989. Bulletin 2379. _______________(1986a). A Brief Guide to Recordkeeping Requirements for Occupational Injuries and Illness, 29 CFR 1904. 19Pp. _______________(1986b). Recordkeeping Guidelines for Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. April 1986. 84Pp. Wasserberger, J.; Ordog, G.; Kolodny, M. et al. (1989). "Violence in a Community Emergency Room." Arch Emer Med 6:266-269. Wolfgang, M. (1986). "Homicide in Other Industrialized Countries." Bull NYAcad Med 62:400. |